<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tin Drum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://radioclare.com/2009/01/the-tin-drum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://radioclare.com/2009/01/the-tin-drum/</link>
	<description>Stories &#38; Musings From A Duck Enthusiast Whose Life Is Stranger Than Fiction</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:05:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Clayton</title>
		<link>http://radioclare.com/2009/01/the-tin-drum/comment-page-1/#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://radioclare.com/?p=763#comment-1254</guid>
		<description>Thank you for your comments. I have often wondered how the evaluation of &quot;great literature&quot; is made and by whom...this is one such work. I am on disc two of the audio version of the book and I have already begun to question the point of the novel. I am not a prude and consider myself an avid reader for well over 45 years. I have exactly the same feelings about the book as you have expressed here. Odd that critics find almost anything vulgar stimulating reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for your comments. I have often wondered how the evaluation of &#8220;great literature&#8221; is made and by whom&#8230;this is one such work. I am on disc two of the audio version of the book and I have already begun to question the point of the novel. I am not a prude and consider myself an avid reader for well over 45 years. I have exactly the same feelings about the book as you have expressed here. Odd that critics find almost anything vulgar stimulating reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

